CALOTCholecystectomy Anatomy, Learning & Operative Technique Exam zone
Foundations

Imaging for surgeons

Each test answers a different question. Knowing what it cannot show matters as much as knowing what it can.

Latest source: de Oliveira et al., Eur Radiol 2024; IDSA 2024 · about 9 min read · how evidence is marked

Reviewed against its sources on 25 October 2026.

Three things to remember
  1. Ultrasound first, always; a normal duct on ultrasound does not rule out a duct stone.
  2. CT is for doubt and complications; for acute cholecystitis it matches ultrasound and is the next test when ultrasound is equivocal.
  3. MRCP or endoscopic ultrasound decides who needs ERCP; HIDA is the most accurate test when ultrasound and CT leave doubt.

01Ultrasound: the first test

Know this
  • Every patient with suspected gallstone disease has an ultrasound first. It is cheap and fast, uses no radiation, and finds gallbladder stones well.
  • It is a weak test for acute cholecystitis and a poor test for duct stones. A normal duct on ultrasound does not rule out a stone in it.
  • Read the report against the patient. A thick wall, fluid or a “positive Murphy’s” means little on its own.
81% / 83%
sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for acute cholecystitis (57 studies, 5,859 patients)
73% / 91%
sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for common bile duct stones (Cochrane, 5 studies, 523 people)
~27 in 100
people with a duct stone have an ultrasound that misses it
Ultrasound: the first test
In the reportWhat it tells youWatch out for
Stones: mobile, shadowingGallstone disease is likely the causeA stone impacted in the neck does not move; it may be the cause of cholecystitis
Wall thickening, pericholecystic fluid, distensionSupport acute cholecystitis with the right clinical pictureThe wall is also thick in heart failure, cirrhosis, ascites, low albumin and hepatitis
Sonographic Murphy’s signTenderness over the gallbladder under the probeLost after opiates, and in the elderly or diabetic patient
Gas in the wall or lumen, a broken wall, a collectionEmphysematous, gangrenous or perforated gallbladder: a harder operationPlan for a senior surgeon and a bail-out
Common bile duct diameterDilated duct raises the chance of a duct stoneWrite the number in the notes; it decides the next test with the liver tests
Polyp: size, stalk, wallSize and shape decide follow-up or surgerySee gallbladder polyps
Focal or irregular wall thickening, a mass, liver invasionPossible gallbladder cancerCross-sectional imaging and a hepatobiliary opinion before any operation
Do
  • Look at the images, or ask the radiologist, when the report will change what you do.
  • Combine the duct diameter with the liver tests to grade the risk of a duct stone. See when to image the duct.
  • Repeat the scan when the picture changes: a patient with colic who becomes septic needs a new look. Expert opinion
Don’t
  • Treat a normal duct on ultrasound as proof there is no stone.
  • Call a thick wall cholecystitis in a patient with heart failure or cirrhosis without other signs.
  • Operate on an ultrasound report you have not checked against the clinical picture. Expert opinion
Sources

Acute cholecystitis: Kiewiet et al., Radiology 2012;264:708-720, meta-analysis of 57 studies. Ultrasound sensitivity 81 percent (95% CI 75 to 87), specificity 83 percent (74 to 89); the authors note a wide margin of error. Systematic review Duct stones: Gurusamy et al., Cochrane 2015. Ultrasound sensitivity 0.73 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.90), specificity 0.91 (0.84 to 0.95). In one study of 262 people, bilirubin above about 1.3 mg/dL had a sensitivity of 0.84 and specificity of 0.91. The authors warn that many people have duct stones despite a negative ultrasound or normal liver tests. Systematic review The causes of a thick wall other than cholecystitis are standard radiological teaching.

02CT: for doubt and for complications

Know this
  • CT is not a gallstone test. Many stones have the same density as bile and do not show.
  • It earns its place when the diagnosis is in doubt, when the gallbladder may be gangrenous, perforated or emphysematous, when cancer is suspected, and after an operation that is not going well.
  • For acute cholecystitis itself, CT performs about as well as ultrasound in a 2024 meta-analysis, and 2024 IDSA guidance suggests CT as the next test when the ultrasound is equivocal and suspicion persists. Ultrasound stays the first test.
84% / 94%
sensitivity and specificity of CT for acute cholecystitis in five head-to-head studies (2024 meta-analysis)
79% / 94%
ultrasound in the same studies; neither difference was significant
4–8%
of patients had their management changed by a second test after the first

Before the operation

Another diagnosis is possible: perforated ulcer, pancreatitis, appendicitis, a colonic or renal cause. The gallbladder may be gangrenous (a wall that does not enhance), emphysematous (gas in the wall) or perforated (a defect and a collection). A mass or liver invasion is suspected.

Suspected cancer: stage with CT (and MRI as needed) before any operation

After the operation

Pain, fever, ileus or a rising CRP after a cholecystectomy: CT shows a collection, free fluid, bleeding or a bowel injury. It does not show the bile ducts well; magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) does.

A collection after cholecystectomy is bile until proved otherwise. See bile leak

In pancreatitis

Contrast CT is for diagnostic doubt on admission and for the patient who is not improving. Early CT rarely changes treatment and can understate necrosis. Expert opinion

See gallstone pancreatitis

Source

Kiewiet et al., Radiology 2012: only one study of CT met the inclusion criteria (sensitivity 94 percent, specificity 59 percent), so in 2012 the authors judged CT “insufficiently evaluated” for acute cholecystitis. Systematic review The 2024 meta-analysis of 64 studies, five of them head to head, found CT sensitivity 83.9 percent (95% CI 78.4 to 88.2) and specificity 94 percent (82 to 98) against 79.0 and 93.6 percent for ultrasound in the same patients, with the two tests agreeing in 82 percent of cases; a second test ordered after the first changed management in 4 to 8 percent (de Oliveira et al., Eur Radiol 2024). Systematic review The IDSA 2024 guideline suggests ultrasound as the first test and CT as the next test when the ultrasound is equivocal or non-diagnostic and clinical suspicion persists, with HIDA or MRI after both (all conditional, very low to low certainty) (IDSA 2024, Clin Infect Dis). Guideline The other uses listed above are standard practice. Expert opinion

03MRCP and endoscopic ultrasound for duct stones

Know this
  • Both are accurate. Use one of them for the patient at intermediate risk of a duct stone, so that endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is kept for treatment and not used to make the diagnosis.
  • MRCP needs no endoscope and no sedation, and it also shows the duct anatomy. It misses some stones under about 5 mm.
  • Endoscopic ultrasound finds small stones better, and an ERCP can follow in the same session, but it needs an endoscopist and sedation.
95% / 97%
sensitivity and specificity of endoscopic ultrasound for duct stones (13 studies, 1,537 participants)
93% / 96%
sensitivity and specificity of MRCP (7 studies, 996 participants)
18 studies
2,366 participants in the Cochrane review; methodological quality was poor
Do
  • Choose by local access: MRCP is the usual test in the UK and India; endoscopic ultrasound where it is quick to get. Expert opinion
  • Look at the MRCP for anatomy as well as stones: a low or parallel cystic duct, an aberrant right posterior sectoral duct. Expert opinion
  • Use MRCP to map the ducts after a suspected injury. See bile duct injury.
Don’t
  • Treat a normal MRCP as excluding a small stone when the liver tests keep rising.
  • Use the MRCP as a road map in place of the Critical View of Safety. Anatomy on a scan does not replace identification in the operation. Expert opinion
  • Send a patient with cholangitis for MRCP first. Drainage comes first. See treatment of cholangitis.
Sources

Giljaca et al., Cochrane 2015: endoscopic ultrasound sensitivity 0.95 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.97), specificity 0.97 (0.94 to 0.99); MRCP sensitivity 0.93 (0.87 to 0.96), specificity 0.96 (0.90 to 0.98). Both tests had high accuracy; the authors asked readers to interpret the results with caution because the studies were of poor quality. Systematic review Risk groups for duct stones: Buxbaum et al., ASGE guideline 2019. Guideline

04HIDA scan (cholescintigraphy)

Know this
  • A radioactive tracer is taken up by the liver and excreted in bile. If the gallbladder does not fill, the cystic duct is blocked, which in the right patient means acute cholecystitis.
  • It is the most accurate single test for acute cholecystitis, but it takes hours, needs a nuclear medicine department and is not available everywhere.
  • Use it when ultrasound, and usually CT, have left the diagnosis open and the decision to operate depends on the answer. IDSA 2024 places it after CT.
96% / 90%
sensitivity and specificity of cholescintigraphy for acute cholecystitis, the highest of any test in the meta-analysis

Useful for

Suspected acute cholecystitis that ultrasound, and usually CT, have left in doubt. Suspected acalculous cholecystitis (see acalculous cholecystitis). Showing that bile is leaking after a cholecystectomy, though not exactly where.

False results

The gallbladder may not fill without cholecystitis after a long fast, on parenteral nutrition, in severe illness and in liver disease. A patient who has just eaten may fill slowly. Expert opinion

Gallbladder ejection fraction

Used for suspected functional gallbladder pain without stones. The evidence that a low ejection fraction predicts relief after cholecystectomy is weak. Contested

Source

Kiewiet et al., Radiology 2012: cholescintigraphy sensitivity 96 percent (95% CI 94 to 97), specificity 90 percent (86 to 93); MRI 85 and 81 percent. “Cholescintigraphy has the highest diagnostic accuracy of all imaging modalities in detection of acute cholecystitis.” Systematic review

05Cholangiograms: on the table and after

Know this
  • An intra-operative cholangiogram is only as safe as its reading. Read it in a fixed order before anything is divided: technique, both hepatic systems, cystic duct and junction, common duct, flow into the duodenum.
  • A missing right hepatic system, a cut-off with no filling above it, or contrast outside the ducts is an injury until proved otherwise. Stop.
  • After the operation, a cholangiogram comes from MRCP, ERCP or a percutaneous route. Each answers a different question.

The step-by-step reading is on the indocyanine green (ICG) page: how to read an intra-operative cholangiogram. Routine or selective use is covered under routine or selective cholangiography.

Cholangiograms: on the table and after
After the operationBest forLimits
MRCPMapping the ducts: a stone, a stricture, a transection, the level of an injuryShows no leak unless contrast is used; no treatment
ERCPLeak from the cystic stump or a duct of Luschka, a retained stone: diagnosis and stent or clearance at onceShows nothing above a complete transection or clip on the common duct
Percutaneous cholangiogramThe ducts above a complete block, with drainage at the same timeHard with undilated ducts; for specialist units
Source

A correct cholangiogram shows the anatomy, filling of the right and left hepatic ducts and flow into the duodenum without filling defects (Hope et al., SAGES clinical spotlight review on intra-operative cholangiography). Guideline The table of post-operative tests is standard hepatobiliary practice. Expert opinion

06Which test, when

Which test, when
The questionFirst testThen
Is it gallstones?UltrasoundRepeat or endoscopic ultrasound if the story is typical and the scan is normal
Is it acute cholecystitis?Ultrasound with the Tokyo criteriaEquivocal and suspicion persists: CT next (IDSA 2024), which also shows another diagnosis or a complication. Still unclear: HIDA or MRI. Where HIDA is quick to get, some units go to it straight after the ultrasound because it is the most accurate single test (Kiewiet 2012); both routes are reasonable
Is there a duct stone? Intermediate riskMRCP or endoscopic ultrasoundERCP only to treat; or cholangiography and duct exploration at the operation
Is there a duct stone? High riskERCP before surgery, or cholangiography and exploration at surgerySee bile duct exploration
Fever, jaundice and painBloods, cultures, ultrasoundDrainage by grade; MRCP only once the patient is safe. See cholangitis
Jaundice or pain after cholecystectomyLiver tests, ultrasound or CTMRCP to map; ERCP to treat a stone or leak; refer early if the duct may be injured
A mass or focal thickeningCT (and MRI)Hepatobiliary opinion before any operation. See gallbladder cancer
Pancreatitis not improving after 2 to 3 daysContrast CTMRCP or endoscopic ultrasound if a duct stone is still suspected

This table is a summary of the pages linked from it and of standard practice. The acute cholecystitis row follows the IDSA 2024 sequence (ultrasound, then CT, then HIDA or MRI; all conditional recommendations) and notes the HIDA-first alternative that rests on its accuracy in the 2012 meta-analysis. Local access often decides between equally good tests. Guideline Expert opinion

07What examiners ask

  1. The ultrasound shows a 7 mm duct and no stone; the bilirubin is 2.3 mg/dL. Does the patient have a duct stone, and what next?
  2. Why is CT a poor test for gallstones, and when do you ask for one?
  3. MRCP or endoscopic ultrasound: how do you choose?
  4. What is a HIDA scan, and when would it change your decision?
  5. Read this cholangiogram aloud. What would make you stop?
Most recent sources on this page: de Oliveira et al., Eur Radiol 2024 (CT versus ultrasound); IDSA 2024 imaging guidance; Gurusamy et al. and Giljaca et al., Cochrane 2015; Kiewiet et al., Radiology 2012.

Test yourself further: Practise questions on Imaging for surgeons in the Exam zone.